Previous page Next
page
021005-2 Cyrix and Lacuna #2
Episode 2 The Empire, not intel but "AMD",
Strikes Back
I forgot to mention that
I found et9603.exe contained cache driver for OS/2 after I wrote
comment to George
Albus. George wrote me it didn't improve DISK I/O marks.
I had a good result with
Cyrix with DOS and Win9x. So I wanted to know if Cyrix
is really
not good for Warp...
Pulled out CD-ROM-II and disassembled it. Connected DC power
and tested it. Caddy went down inward to the drive. Next, connected SCSI
cable and powered it up. No go. Looked into SCSI pins and found one pin
bent down. I don't know if it was the reason of the trouble but after I
straighten the pin the CD ROM-II became alive.
Time to install Warp.....but I completely forgot install procedure
for coexistence of DOS and OS/2. Well it was not the point. May be
setting for boot manager was wrong but installation completed somehow.
All I wanted is running SYSBENCH on OS/2 for Cyrix and DX4.
Installation completed and WARP 3 came up. Set resolution to 800x600
65536C.
Installed SysBench 0.9.4g.
Result
9577-BTG 33MHz planar
Hard Drive ; EIDE Quantum Fireball ST, 2160AT
CD-ROM ; Toshiba XM3401BMA 2.1x speed off from
IBM SCSI II ( OEM'ed FD MCS-700 ).
RAM ; 8MB
x4
Resolution; 800x600, 65K color depth
OS/2 Warp 3 Connect
NO FIX Pack applied yet.
File system; FAT
Test result of SysBench 0.9.4g
|
CPU
Integer |
CPU
Float |
Dive |
PM |
Disk I/O |
CD I/O |
DX4-100 |
44.159 |
4.809 |
10.225 |
21.411 |
15.999 |
17.304 |
Cyrix5x86 3x
*1 |
45.262 |
6.088 |
10.136 |
14.230 |
9.056 |
17.284 |
Cyrix5x86 3x ET *2 |
45.159 |
6.066 |
10.116 |
14.232 |
8.778 |
17.285 |
IBM5x86 3x
*1 |
45.138 |
6.060 |
10.127 |
14.231 |
9.440 |
17.285 |
IBM5x86 3x ET *3 |
49.007 |
5.816 |
10.094 |
13.093 |
6.341 |
17.268 |
Cyrix5x86 4x ET *3 |
51.821 |
7.756 |
10.140 |
14.270 |
9.355 |
17.291 |
Cyrix5c86 4x ET *4 |
62.924 |
7.377 |
10.120 |
13.168 |
6.478 |
17.269 |
Cyrix5x86 4x ET *5 |
62.986 |
7.471 |
10.111 |
13.154 |
6.456 |
17.270 |
am5x86 4x QFP *6 |
50.331 |
6.085 |
10.212 |
21.648 |
15.300 |
17.308 |
am5x86 4x PL586 *7 |
65.945 |
5.492 |
10.249 |
21.834 |
17.263 |
17.312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SORRY that I can't locate appropriate 3x interposers for Lacuna
socket except Evergreen586 at
this moment.
ET means cache driver et586OS2.sys
is used
Interposer; EverGreen
586 is used for *1, *2, *3, *4, *5. CB/on
PowerLeap PL586
is used for *7 . WB/on.
*1 Cache driver not used
*2 Cache driver; default setting ( /CCR4=1D )
*3 Cache driver; default setting ( /CCR4=1D )
*4 Cache driver; /CCR4=1D /WBE
*5 Cache driver; /CCR2=56
/CCR4=1D /WBE ( worked fine on
5551-R and Win98 )
*6 EverGreen amd5x86/QFP
Upgrade , WB/ON
*7 AMD 5x86/PGA on PowerLeap PL586 on an 486 socket
interposer ( like the one for PODP )
Cyrix5x86 used for *3 through *4 is 133MHz unit. Can't
find my favorite x4 100MHz beast.
Cyrix5x86 *2 is x3 100GP
HAS-33T
in the GETA page does not fit to the socket. Interposer's PCB hits the
Power connector
from the PSU.
PowerLeap
PL586 also does not fit to the socket. SW block under the PCB hits
capacitors inside
the socket. It needs another socket
PGA DX4
....ZIF lever will hit overhang of the interposer for voltage regulator!!
Impression
No, It shouldn't be...... But Fact is fact.
I have not yet tested other SW settings, but so far it
seems that Cyrix5x86 is not good at DISK I/O and Video test
on OS/2 ( and on Lacuna ).
CPU integer and Floating point hit really a good score but PM
and Disk I/O are really slower than
DX4-100. AMD is better than Cyrix on Video and Disk I/O.
I shall seek and find other register setting...not now. but in
SOMEDAY .
( as a matter of fact, I should have to write "Tomorrow"
in stead of "someday". )
Monologue; I still can't believe the result !
Wondering if Sysbench was programed to use special
instructions ( or function ? ) of Intel CPU. Actual performance of Cyrix
does not seem
so bad...... Next time I'll try with x4 capable 100MHz unit.
Previous page Next
page
( I couldn't resist seeking secret of Cyrix )
Still Crazy Top
PS/55 Index
|